Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do

MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal employees have till February 6 to choose whether to willingly leave their tasks. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, informed workers on Tuesday that if they hand in their resignation by next Thursday – that’s less than a week from now – most will be permitted to take leave and be paid till completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is an employment legal representative who represents federal staff members as a big part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM’s deferred resignation program would in fact mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I in fact don’t consider it a lot an offer. I think it’s a demand to resign with an unclear pledge that, potentially, employment you might be kept in administrative leave status for as much as 8 months – however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some individuals have actually been using the term buyout to explain what this is because there appears to be the deal of administrative leave for approximately 8 months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never describe it as a buyout. I believe that’s an extremely deceptive term to use in this circumstance. When you consider a buyout, there’s generally some sort of composed arrangement or a concrete offer to supply a benefit in exchange for waiving specific rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your guidance, what are you informing them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is workout severe caution. There are no warranties consisted of in this email. The only thing I can inform you for certain is that if you alter your mind, the firm’s probably not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are essentially quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Is there some classification of employee who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they’re close to retirement. Is someone like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most mindful because leaving earlier than planned can have serious consequences, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me simply play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She informed reporters that this is a good offer for people who don’t want to go back to the office. Let me just play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is an idea to federal employees that they need to return in – to work. And if they do not, then they have the option to resign, and employment this administration is extremely generously using to pay them for 8 months.MARTIN: employment You’re shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just – in a manner, it breaks my heart that federal workers are being jerked around like this. It sends a signal to me that this return-to-office order remains in bad faith, that it’s developed to get folks who work really difficult to resign. I believe it’s trying to pull the wool over a lot of individuals’s eyes because there are no assurances. And these are people who enjoy their task. They enjoy the objective of the company. They strive. And today, they’re dealing with very hard options, particularly if they’re remote. I mean, it’s really coercive.MARTIN: You say it’s coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you’re somebody who resides in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. or else we’re going to fire you, they might feel that they have no choice than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you challenges simply to the deal itself? And if so, employment on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be truthful, employment is so unprecedented that I believe a great deal of us are still attempting to find out what to do with it. I’m not sure if the deal itself may be challengeable. I think the larger concern is the execution of these terms. I’m not knowledgeable about any authority that exists right now for OPM to purchase firms to offer this variety of individuals administrative leave. So I think it is quite perhaps setting the stage for difficulties because I feel OPM has greatly exceeded their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is an employment attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for employment joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.

Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights reserved. Visit our website regards to use and approvals pages at www.npr.org for additional information.

NPR records are created on a rush deadline by an NPR specialist. This text may not remain in its final kind and employment might be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability might vary. The authoritative record of NPR’s shows is the audio record.